Factom & StackBlitzed
Привет, я тут копалась, как лучше защитить конфиденциальные данные в нашем клиентском коде. Может, вместе выработаем надёжный, пошаговый план, чтобы исключить утечки?
Sure thing, just keep it tight and don’t let any of that data leak past the edge of the browser. Here’s a quick recipe:
1. **Never store secrets in the code** – drop any API keys, tokens, or passwords out of the repo and into a server‑side env. If it has to go somewhere on the client, use a short‑lived, signed token that expires fast.
2. **Use HTTPS everywhere** – enforce TLS 1.2+ and pin the certificates if you can. Nothing gets past the network layer if it’s all encrypted.
3. **Apply Content‑Security‑Policy (CSP)** – block inline scripts, only allow trusted sources, and use nonce or hash for any needed inline code. That stops XSS which is the usual leak vector.
4. **Minimize exposed data** – send only the fields you need. Strip any PII before it hits the network.
5. **Hash sensitive values before sending** – use a client‑side hash (SHA‑256 is fine) if you need to verify something locally, but don’t rely on it for auth. Keep the salt on the server.
6. **Avoid eval and dynamic imports** – those let attackers inject code. Stick to static imports and well‑known modules.
7. **Audit third‑party libs** – use a lockfile, lock to a known good commit, and keep the old, deprecated libs in a separate folder for nostalgia.
8. **Rate‑limit and detect anomalies** – if a single client is spamming the endpoint, block it.
9. **Test in isolation** – run the app in a sandboxed iframe with strict sandbox attributes, then integrate.
10. **Continuous monitoring** – watch the commit history, set up a simple script that scans for any new strings that look like secrets, and fail the build if it finds one.
That’s the core loop. Throw a couple of unit tests on each boundary, stay caffeine‑fed, and you’ll keep the leaks at bay. Let me know if you want a deeper dive on any step.